AnnaRose Richards #3 Anna Scamma's NFT will tank, but she doesn't care cos she's making bank

[skeptical_sausage]

Oops - you damn crazies sabotaged it ..... HUMBLED??? Oh Anna, you are the exact opposite of humbled hahahahahaha



View attachment 1572224 q

What the duck.

She does realise that she won’t be the best at everything and win all the things, right? Like, just because she ‘lost’ to another NFT on a (bleeping pointless and pathetic) Twitter poll does not mean the result was sabotaged by her ‘confused admirers’. It simply means the other NFT was voted on more. Simple. And perhaps she should learn to be gracious and accept that there are others playing in the NFT that might be worthy of those votes?

She’s so salty.

Speaks volumes on her character; self absorbed and victim mentality. Always trying to pull at the sympathetic heartstrings of her fan girls.

I can’t speak for all of y’all, but I sure as tit didn’t go out of my way to create a Twitter account just to vote on a poll on an account I don’t know just to ‘stick it to Anna’ Chill on the koolaid, Anna Rose Richards. If your The Awakened Woman NFT was so bleeping amazing, it’d speak for itself.

 

[skeptical_sausage]

“You’re not liking my ridiculous, idiotic reels and posts, so I’m taking my bat and ball and going home!”

And the academy award for the most hypocritical person on the internet goes to…..



So predictable. Another week, another tantrum.

 

[Pindawg]

“You’re not liking my ridiculous, idiotic reels and posts, so I’m taking my bat and ball and going home!”

want to
want to
wanna

and it all started so well and grandiose...........

 

[KrittyKat]

Her nose is literally as wide as her smile

oh lord - I can’t unsee this now!!!

 

[bossbabetears]

“You’re not liking my ridiculous, idiotic reels and posts, so I’m taking my bat and ball and going home!”

When she says “brain decaying garbage” does she mean that lockdown documentary she made on MovieMaker?

 

[aussieanonforlyf]

That is without a doubt the worst explanation of web3 I could imagine.

 

[CouldSizeDown]

That is without a doubt the worst explanation of web3 I could imagine.

Right??? It was absolutely nonsensical. I feel like I understood LESS after watching that reel.

 

[pettybetty1]

So bizarre Trent is with Anna, must of left melb with her, but he is so careful not to post anything about her. She posted some BS about her morning swim etc and Trent was no where in sight (in the video) it honestly must hurt Anna so much knowing her “life partner love of her life twin soul flame” will not publicly, properly acknowledge her or their relationship. Trent is so careful when he films that he has no part of Anna in his video, he never even references her, or makes out like he is in the same room with anyone. And Anna, oh Anna, she is with a man she can’t ever post about, won’t take photos and videos with her. The most she can do is name drop him and say “we” it’s honestly so sad. Anna is so far into her “haters” I genuinely believe she comforts herself and tells herself this is why Trent won’t acknowledge the relationship. But babe, he never did. Never ever. Even before your tattle threads blew up, and before the nft, he never acknowledged the relationship or her. It’s honestly crazy to me she puts up with that behaviour? How can she feel confident or secure? I certainly would not. I know posting significant others all over social media is unnecessary, totally get that. But he’s a damn co founder or their NFT and won’t acknowledge her when she’s literally standing 5meters away from him! Heaven forbid they are in the same video of the “artwork” He won’t acknowledge her ever. Crazy!
The only way you can tell they are in the same
room is from Anna’s tacky rug in the background!!!!!
also, did Anna actually sell out 20% nfts on day 1??????

 

[raspberrypancake]

So bizarre Trent is with Anna, must of left melb with her, but he is so careful not to post anything about her. She posted some BS about her morning swim etc and Trent was no where in sight (in the video) it honestly must hurt Anna so much knowing her “life partner love of her life twin soul flame” will not publicly, properly acknowledge her or their relationship. Trent is so careful when he films that he has no part of Anna in his video, he never even references her, or makes out like he is in the same room with anyone. And Anna, oh Anna, she is with a man she can’t ever post about, won’t take photos and videos with her. The most she can do is name drop him and say “we” it’s honestly so sad. Anna is so far into her “haters” I genuinely believe she comforts herself and tells herself this is why Trent won’t acknowledge the relationship. But babe, he never did. Never ever. Even before your tattle threads blew up, and before the nft, he never acknowledged the relationship or her. It’s honestly crazy to me she puts up with that behaviour? How can she feel confident or secure? I certainly would not. I know posting significant others all over social media is unnecessary, totally get that. But he’s a damn co founder or their NFT and won’t acknowledge her when she’s literally standing 5meters away from him! Heaven forbid they are in the same video of the “artwork” He won’t acknowledge her ever. Crazy!
The only way you can tell they are in the same
room is from Anna’s tacky rug in the background!!!!!
also, did Anna actually sell out 20% nfts on day 1??????

I still can’t get over this (from KrittyKat a while ago). She often gets away with things by being super vague like “oh no it was a different high school boy who died from the jab” or “I was never 100% founder, this co-founder was always there”. But this is like… hard evidence of a blatant lie. Fk I would love her followers to see this but they would probably just be like “our lord and saviour Anna had her reasons!”
I have spent too much energy feeling sorry for those she has grifted. They’re honestly too far gone.

Also, as if this isn’t borderline black-face. Why do these WOC have Scandinavian features? She’s just drawn white women and used the paint bucket tool to fill in their skin brown. *Tokenistic diversity achieved*. Phenomenal.

 

[pettybetty1]

Absolutely deceased that Trent put 2/3 pics from melb footy weekend in his 22 highlights. The one pic he conveniently left out was the photo with Anna in it that she begged him to post from her stories. Anna, you are not an awake woman. Wake up. He purposely did NOT post you even in his story highlights. But posted the football game and the pic with his dad. You are a sucker.

 

[itsnotaboutthepasta]

Absolutely deceased that Trent put 2/3 pics from melb footy weekend in his 22 highlights. The one pic he conveniently left out was the photo with Anna in it that she begged him to post from her stories. Anna, you are not an awake woman. Wake up. He purposely did NOT post you even in his story highlights. But posted the football game and the pic with his dad. You are a sucker.

Anna will never be in his highlights, I would feel sorry for her if she wasn’t such a crappy person. Trent will 100% have others on the side.

 

[pettybetty1]

Anna will never be in his highlights, I would feel sorry for her if she wasn’t such a crappy person. Trent will 100% have others on the side.

Yes, I believe Trent doesn’t post Anna for 2 reasons. 1. He is a player, he absolutely has side pieces. Probably many. 2. He is ashamed of her physically, but he see’s the potential in her scams and the ability to scam money.
I wonder how long he can keep her happy about them living in seperate states though

 

[HipHippoRay]

I still can’t get over this (from KrittyKat a while ago). She often gets away with things by being super vague like “oh no it was a different high school boy who died from the jab” or “I was never 100% founder, this co-founder was always there”. But this is like… hard evidence of a blatant lie. Fk I would love her followers to see this but they would probably just be like “our lord and saviour Anna had her reasons!”
I have spent too much energy feeling sorry for those she has grifted. They’re honestly too far gone.

Also, as if this isn’t borderline black-face. Why do these WOC have Scandinavian features? She’s just drawn white women and used the paint bucket tool to fill in their skin brown. *Tokenistic diversity achieved*. Phenomenal.

whats the 1st one from? Did she admit to having a male co founder? I'm lost on that one LOL

Also, he had a pic of her in his stories over the weekend only the one I believe.

 

[raspberrypancake]

whats the 1st one from? Did she admit to having a male co founder? I'm lost on that one LOL

Also, he had a pic of her in his stories over the weekend only the one I believe.

She’s saying that it is 100% female led. She’s saying that many projects tend to have a male co-founder however she is the co-founder of this project. So she is saying that she is the one and only founder and she is a female, despite many other projects having male cofounders. She’s explicitly stating that there is no male co-founder involved in the awakened woman.

 

[CouldSizeDown]

also, did Anna actually sell out 20% nfts on day 1??????

Nope, she definitely didn't. 20% of the collection is 1,111 NFTs. Definitely didn't hit that number on the first day.

 

[HipHippoRay]

She’s saying that it is 100% female led. She’s saying that many projects tend to have a male co-founder however she is the co-founder of this project. So she is saying that she is the one and only founder and she is a female, despite many other projects having male cofounders. She’s explicitly stating that there is no male co-founder involved in the awakened woman.

Ahhh yep, I get it now…. I was like ahhhhh what lol. So, who’s the other co founder then Anna

 

[Elconcerta]

That picture in purple from her stories talking about founders and co founders makes no sense. She’s trying to justify her changing her story from 100% founder to “co-founder” by saying that most/all other projects have the same. No, Anna, you’re trying to cover up the lie/change in narrative half way through the project. It was originally 100% female led to now not 100%.

 

[raspberrypancake]

That picture in purple from her stories talking about founders and co founders makes no sense. She’s trying to justify her changing her story from 100% founder to “co-founder” by saying that most/all other projects have the same. No, Anna, you’re trying to cover up the lie/change in narrative half way through the project. It was originally 100% female led to now not 100%.

It’s so bizarre that she would say “most other projects have a male cofounder but not ours” when that is LITERALLY HER SITUATION.

This purple story was from BEFORE the whole Trent cofounder thing came out, by the way. Sorry to confuse! It was something she posted a while ago, talking about how it is 100% female led. That story right there is hard evidence of her blatantly lying to her followers.

Her followers obviously either don’t remember her saying this, don’t care, or they remembered and asked about it and got kicked out and blocked.

 

[Carrots85]

Not exactly ‘ news’ but Anna Rose Richards IS a liar. ‘Tis why we are not exactly ‘confused admirers’ but most definitely astute at sniffing out deception by a rip off artist. So not confused haters seems fair. Anna Scamma guess what? Not every influencer, instagrammer, mlm pusher has a tattle thread … but the disengenuous, the liars, the narcissists tend to

 

[It's A Beautiful Day]

Um no, a smart business woman wouldn't 'mint' an awakened woman