Anna Bey #21 Affluence Faker, Elegance Scammer, Content Stealer, Zara Bitter.

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
The title was "5 status symbols every AFFLUENT woman must have"... See how she twisted it?


Actually it was “5 status symbols all Elegant women must have” BUT people got offended that she equated elegance to owning materialistic items (which is exactly the real her, but of course had to back track to keep up the charade a little longer).

What she MEANT was what you said “5 status symbols every AFFLUENT woman must have” (that’s what she says in her apology video and that’s the clarification she is talking about in her new video but when she does that it only FURTHER REVEALS that in her mind affluence is all about showing off materialistic goods which is STILL NOT why people supposedly follow her (at least not her most loyal followers). So, she’s actually offended them COMING & GOING!!

There’s no way to clarify something you actually meant, Anna!! By her own words in the apology video, she’s only dug herself into a deeper hole.. HER MASK IS STARTING TO SLIP.. and she’s grasping for straws to keep it from totally falling.




10120680-804E-472F-BAD8-66EA7D2BA219.jpeg
 
Actually it was “5 status symbols all Elegant women must have” BUT people got offended that she equated elegance to owning materialistic items (which is exactly the real her, but of course had to back track to keep up the charade a little longer).

What she MEANT was what you said “5 status symbols every AFFLUENT woman must have” (that’s what she says in her apology video and that’s the clarification she is talking about in her new video but when she does that it only FURTHER REVEALS that in her mind affluence is all about showing off materialistic goods which is STILL NOT why people supposedly follow her (at least not her most loyal followers). So, she’s actually offended them COMING & GOING!!

There’s no way to clarify something you actually meant, Anna!! By her own words in the apology video, she’s only dug herself into a deeper hole.. HER MASK IS STARTING TO SLIP.. and she’s grasping for straws to keep it from totally falling.




View attachment 670327 q

Sorry then and thank you.
I used my history to find how I searched it. Didn't work though so assumed it was "affluent". That's why I love screenshots.

EDIT: She should delete this video too! :ROFLMAO:
 
Update: Here are some of the new comments I was able to screenshot under the FB post I shared yesterday (regarding people responding to her deleted YT video).

Compare these comments to what you see on her IG and it’s day & night! When she’s unable to delete comments, we get the full picture of how people truly feel about her. People are starting to see that she has no substance.



View attachment 670074 q

View attachment 670075 q

View attachment 670076 q
ohhh, really hope Anna has read these! Not sure where this was posted - in her group or the Socialite Group?
 
she’s clearly someone with a rectangular figure, not an hourglass. I think there is nothing wrong with having a rectangular body shape, but to blatantly lie about it (to feel better about oneself? Why do that??) and encourage this strange self-hate/dysmorphia phenomenon in other women with similar body shapes is unfortunate.

she could instead make this an opportunity to show off how to flatter a non hourglass body shape and prove that not everyone has to be an hourglass to be beautiful.
 

Attachments

  • F1E3EEE0-6DD0-4E2C-8168-00A871044CB0.jpeg
    F1E3EEE0-6DD0-4E2C-8168-00A871044CB0.jpeg
    53.4 KB · Views: 194
Girls, I know some of you are real Hermès fans and connaisseuses (unlike Anna Beytch).
I like them but won't lie saying I know all there is to know about this bag.
I never saw this kind of leather-covered lock. I know however they come in various styles (such as diamonds,not that Banana can afford them). Do you think it may be sign it's counterfeit?

10120680-804E-472F-BAD8-66EA7D2BA219.jpeg
lly on
 
We're gonna have a new thread by the weekend. :LOL:

Coming to think about her elegant content and the deleted video... Have any of you guys ever heard anyone saying a X car brand is elegant? The day the car industry uses "elegant" as a qualifier for a car... Can you imagine the advertisement?

"It's a funny thing about a Porsche. Something that drives us deep down. Something that keeps us young and revitalizes us. Keep daring. Keep dreaming. With elegance. Porsche."

This :poop: won't sell!
 
Let her make believe it's all Jehovah's witnesses paradise for her in Cannes "right now".
Those who have critical thinking will notice with this recent video that she takes her public for stupid.



Everybody, buy popcorn in bulk.
Girl, get ready to demand some payment.

Aija is one of those people who will do anything to keep up appearances. So it is sure that his strategy will be to partially confess these lies. But she will never say "I preferred to keep some things private because it's not good for my public image" (which I think would be an understandable speech. Instead, she will say "I didn't say it because I was so ashamed, these things traumatized me😢". There will be a long chapter about oh how mean people online are and try to expose her and that, that's why she's taking the lead. That way , she'll make Tattle people and other clairvoyant people look infinitely mean. She is so predictable, poor Aija.

EDIT : The video will end with a link to a fundraiser for sexually exploited women.
 
Last edited:
Her face looks bloated in this latest 'apology' video and she keeps looking to one side, sign of someone lying. I wish psychologist to do a review of this video the same way they did Meghan's interview with Oprah or other sociopaths getting caught lying.
Oh her body/face language is totally of a liar…
 

Attachments

  • DAB7E0D5-8075-40F9-B557-492DD06B1A3F.jpeg
    DAB7E0D5-8075-40F9-B557-492DD06B1A3F.jpeg
    6.1 KB · Views: 170
Girls, I know some of you are real Hermès fans and connaisseuses (unlike Anna Beytch).
I like them but won't lie saying I know all there is to know about this bag.
I never saw this kind of leather-covered lock. I know however they come in various styles (such as diamonds,not that Banana can afford them). Do you think it may be sign it's counterfeit?

View attachment 670400 qlly on

I'm a peasant, pardon, but really - Kelly bag costs about 30k euros?
Recently I checked some pre-owned goods sites and really, that is THE PRICE?
I knew that these bags are expensive but my mind stopped somewhere about 10-15k for a 'simple' Kelly bag, not diamonds or this exclusive and rare leather. Or these are resell prices because you can't get this bag at all?
 
Another lurker finally joining the conversation here!

I used to watch Anna Bey and originally found her videos entertaining. I joined her free FB group and quickly became annoyed at how shallow the discussions were.

Regarding this recent video, I didn't catch it but from the recaps it was definitely tone deaf. Recently she's been attempting to be more edgy and polarizing, which is typical in bro-marketing, but this video missed the mark. An elegant lady knows how to read the room and this is too sensitive a time to insinuate that a person's worth is tied to labels and material possessions. I wonder how the finishing school she attended feels about one of their graduates presenting themselves like this?

Also, much of this advice is outdated. The new generation of "elites" hold a different set of values. They are more likely to be humanitarians, environmentalists, and activists. You're more likely to rub shoulders with them at a green energy summit than sitting at a bar alone. While labels will always be a thing, many of the young elites are into fair trade, sustainability, and ethical sourcing. In some circles, a custom, handmade purse from an artist in a developing nation makes more of a statement than this season's Chanel.

Look at seasoned social climber Meghan Markle. To get the attention of a prince, she cosplayed humanitarian-- aligning herself with the UN and World Vision. Anna's advice might get you the attention of an old sugar daddy, or the snooty, new money not used to anything crowd, but the descendants of the old money dynasties are more likely to be a little more progressive than their grandparents. They are attracted to educated women who have an identity of their own with a dash of rebellion. Those who do uphold the old tradition will likely marry from their own social class anyway.

Designer bags, luxury cars, and a few stays at a 5-star hotel aren't enough to convince the upper classes that you are one of them. That's how those in the middle class compete with one another. Do you have a family estate? Can you throw a party and entertain the wealthy set on your dime? Are you able to write a 6 to 7-figure check to a charity or as a bid at an auction? Do you have connections that are valuable to those circles? How much land do you own? Are you holding assets in a trust? Do you sit on any boards? Do you have the power to influence policies? Those are just a few of the true markers of the rich and powerful. A bag, car (which ANYONE can rent or borrow), and dinner at a fine dining establishment are child's play. You'll look like a fool running around with a designer bag you spent 6 months rent on acting superior to the woman with a Coach bag when neither of you have the connections to get a meeting with a head of state and neither of you have the capital to secure funding for a major development project. You're just playing dress up.

If you don't come from money and don't have any money, you're always going to be an outsider in that world anyway, whether you're rocking Dior or MK, so be the best version of yourself, which is how I define elegance.
 
A little off-topic:
I recall we had a champagne discussion here before and just got back from the first part of a tasting/touring. It seems like many has switched out the tulip out in favor of this one/a slight modification of this glass:
due to even better aroma, since last time I toured :)

I was the person who mentioned Grimes...when did she herself mention Elon?
I honestly can't recall when she mentioned it, I just remembered how absurd it was that she said she was a better pairing with Elon.
 
I'm a peasant, pardon, but really - Kelly bag costs about 30k euros?
Recently I checked some pre-owned goods sites and really, that is THE PRICE?
I knew that these bags are expensive but my mind stopped somewhere about 10-15k for a 'simple' Kelly bag, not diamonds or this exclusive and rare leather. Or these are resell prices because you can't get this bag at all?
Yes that's a huge amount of money for a bag. They're beautifully crafted, that said.
I reckon what you saw is resale price (and the worst: it MAY be a fake - yes, at this price tag).
Those Kelly and Birkin purses may be the only things that you can resale immediatly for more than what you paid for. That's because of Hermès' exclusivity policy (there are few chance you just walk in a boutique and get a Kelly or Birkin, they tend to keep them for their most regular and generous customers; so people look for it on the 2d hand / resale market).
Let's say that the "regular" price of said bag is """only""" 7K to 10K€ in the boutique. It means that Anna has to go there on a regular basis, buy stuff such as plates, mugs, silk, shoes (1 pair of Oran won't do it), maybe fine jewelry.
She does not have that kind of money to spend and if she had, she would be flaunting every shopping session on her Social Media (like she did in Venice for 1 coat and 2 dresses).
I also know that the Maison Hermès has very low tolerance for couterfeit items; someone could "accidentally" send a pic , a link or two to someone... :devilish: this lock is intriguing to me but I may be mislead anyway. I'm far from being an expert.
 
Last edited:
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top