For the immediate bruising and swelling phase, two weeks is reasonable, based on what I remember from my mother. It was very traumatic seeing my mom like that (I was 16). Kate’s children are much younger. So I can see her instinct to protect them from seeing the worst of it by staying somewhere. Maybe she timed it until they were back in school and busy after the holidays. Full recovery is three months.
In this case, saying abdominal is a lie. But if she hasn’t said it, everyone would have jumped to plastic surgery. It was a lose lose. Or maybe she had something else done too so it’s not a lie.
I do wonder if they'll work on a new Regency Act before WIlliam is king, or leave it as Charles has an heir old enough to rule. If not, and it was left to the current provisions Harry would be up first, Andrew next in line after him. Neither would be ideal.No way is Kate having a facelift as many have already said the scrutiny would be immense once she reappears in the public eye. She most likely gets tweakments regularly though so nobody really notices.
According to the line of succession it’s most definitely Harry who would be Regent until George is 18. Andrew might try to jostle in and Anne would do her best but it will be Harry. If he refuses then I’m not sure what happens.
He's so cringe.Sorry if already posted but awkward
Prince Harry calls out John Travolta for ‘dining out’ on dance floor with mother Princess Diana
Prince Harry, 38, paid tribute to his royal mother Princess Diana, as he was honored at the 21st Annual Living Legends of Aviation Awards in Beverly Hills.www.foxnews.com
Pot calling kettle black I think!
Why on earth did Grimes get these surgeries?! Madness.It sounds like your mum's facelift was a while ago. Techniques have advanced significantly. They're usually home the same day and back to work within a week after one. This is Grimes 1 week post op-ponytail lift (and lip lift I believe), swollen but she wouldn't terrify children by any means.
View attachment 2703492 q
I agree with whoever it was in the last thread who suspected that the reason she's in is more due to catheters and bags, and it being felt more dignified for her to be nursed in hospital vs having to get nurses vetted to be permitted into Kensington Palace.
With all due respect, Anne is not far behind in age from Charles, i believe shes at least 70. It should not have got to a stage where we have so few working royals below 60 YO.I believe Princess Anne steps in
I definitely think it’s bowel related as I know a few people who had bowel problems that ended up with surgery, a long hospital stay and a long recovery.
Yes it looks like it is quite serious and a bit of a shock for everyone. The BM have been briefed and have all backed off.The fact the papers are very quiet on this subject makes me think there is more to it and they’ve been told more than we know.
Harry as a "middle" child? He would have thought that worse than being a "spare"With all due respect, Anne is not far behind in age from Charles, i believe shes at least 70. It should not have got to a stage where we have so few working royals below 60 YO.
I know hindsight is 20 20 but, Charles and Diana should've had another kid. An heir and a spare is not good enough, particularly when you factor in unexpected deaths, abdication etc and it seems for quite a few of generations, there has always been at least 1 child of the monarch who has been or become unsuitable to be a working royal:
Harry, Andrew, Edward 8th etc.
If they are going to insist on having a slim downed monarchy, every heir needs to have at least 3 children. This is all irrelevant if the uk becomes a republic
At that point in their relationship, for Harry to be a middle child would have required a Turkey blaster.Harry as a "middle" child? He would have thought that worse than being a "spare"