Teen Mum Young and Pregnant UK #26

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1 Sort by date Sort by reaction score 2
It seems like the family you knew were an unusual case. Children are very rarely removed from their primary parent. I would imagine there were many more things going on as well as the move causing disruption to the children’s lives. The children’s wishes also would count if they were old enough to express them and maybe they did not want to move schools and friends etc.
I do personally think it’s far too soon for Charlie to be moving so I’m not sticking up for her, but I really do not see even a chance in hell that Brett would get custody because Charlie moved to be nearer her “husband” as H is a baby and so she isn’t disrupting her education, she will obviously still see Charlie’s family and she’s already suggesting different plans for Brett to still see the baby regularly. A court order would be good so that they don’t argue about who does all the driving as it’s a bloody long drive regularly, especially when they have move children to consider in the future.
 
I think it’s very obvious that Brett sees Harlow more than 4 nights a month. The plan might be for Brett to take her every other weekend, but he seems to have her every weekend, he definitely sees her every weekend at least. And then he sees her a few nights throughout the week too. He’s a very involved dad, it’s really not fair to take that away from them both
 
Scar14 said:
I think it’s very obvious that Brett sees Harlow more than 4 nights a month. The plan might be for Brett to take her every other weekend, but he seems to have her every weekend, he definitely sees her every weekend at least. And then he sees her a few nights throughout the week too. He’s a very involved dad, it’s really not fair to take that away from them both
Click to expand...

Ah the last contact plan they shared was that he had her for 2hrs in the week and every other Saturday night. His mum has her every Friday? If I’m wrong about that and he has her all weekend or something then that’s very different x
 
TheDuchessx said:
It seems like the family you knew were an unusual case. Children are very rarely removed from their primary parent. I would imagine there were many more things going on as well as the move causing disruption to the children’s lives. The children’s wishes also would count if they were old enough to express them and maybe they did not want to move schools and friends etc.
I do personally think it’s far too soon for Charlie to be moving so I’m not sticking up for her, but I really do not see even a chance in hell that Brett would get custody because Charlie moved to be nearer her “husband” as H is a baby and so she isn’t disrupting her education, she will obviously still see Charlie’s family and she’s already suggesting different plans for Brett to still see the baby regularly. A court order would be good so that they don’t argue about who does all the driving as it’s a bloody long drive regularly, especially when they have move children to consider in the future.
Click to expand...
Nope, not an unusual case. Just a very good judge who saw the risk to the childrens best interest.

It's my partner's children, so not like it's my friend's next door neighbour's cat who is telling me all these things. I was actively involved in the case so I saw all the reports including the children's wishes to not move and see both parents for equal time. To state that a court would never remove a child from their primary care giver/mother is just wrong and quite dangerous to be spreading to be honest. Courts are much less mother biased now and work in best interests for the child and it's Harlow's best interest to spend as much time with her father as she does with her mother. If mother is wanting to remove Harlow from her entire family, then the court should take that into consideration and allocate more time to Brett because of proximity to Harlow's family
 
justheretonamedrop said:
If I recall he has her two nights at a weekend and sees her two weekday afternoons? Picking her up from the childminder and dropping her home on some days. He sees her a lot imo.
Click to expand...

Good for him! Sorry I was mistaken and thought his mum had her Fridays and he had her every other Saturday so only 2 nights a month! I know they live together right now but they won’t forever x
 
Charlie isn’t going to Stand a chance taking harlow. Especially now her own family are on bretts side she’s gonna end up losing custody if she goes through with it. Court aren’t going to argue it when the dad and his family and then even HER OWN family are against it
 

Attachments

  • DD759421-ED3F-461D-9934-362B2650BCA4.png
    DD759421-ED3F-461D-9934-362B2650BCA4.png
    139.8 KB · Views: 132
TheDuchessx said:
Good for him! Sorry I was mistaken and though his mum had her Fridays and he had her every other Saturday so only 2 nights a month! I know they live together right now but they won’t forever x
Click to expand...

I think towards the end Jane did start having Harlow on her own, I think when Brett was seeing what’s her face, Beth? and would have Harlow alone on the odd weekend but primarily with him living with his mum, I’m 90% sure he had Harlow both nights a lot, but that’s going off memory! I think you are half right, Jane definetly had Harlow some weekends just as nanan time.
 
ItsTeaTime2020 said:
Nope, not an unusual case. Just a very good judge who saw the risk to the childrens best interest.

It's my partner's children, so not like it's my friend's next door neighbour's cat who is telling me all these things. I was actively involved in the case so I saw all the reports including the children's wishes to not move and see both parents for equal time. To state that a court would never remove a child from their primary care giver/mother is just wrong and quite dangerous to be spreading to be honest. Courts are much less mother biased now and work in best interests for the child and it's Harlow's best interest to spend as much time with her father as she does with her mother. If mother is wanting to remove Harlow from her entire family, then the court should take that into consideration and allocate more time to Brett because of proximity to Harlow's family
Click to expand...

I am very happy for you that your partner was able to keep his children close, it must have been a very difficult time for you all. Thank god for your judge being so understanding.
As I said it is different circumstances as the children did not wish to move and expressed that they wanted to spend move time with their dad.
 
TheDuchessx said:
Good for him! Sorry I was mistaken and thought his mum had her Fridays and he had her every other Saturday so only 2 nights a month! I know they live together right now but they won’t forever x
Click to expand...
Brett lives with his dad now, not Jane. Brett seems to go to his mums every Friday to see Harlow though
 
mileinmyslippers said:
Tmg is toxic, my mental health would take a battering featuring on there. Don’t blame her for blocking them. Can’t prattle on about caring for her mental health but will post all her dirty laundry for content. It’s two faced.
Click to expand...
But at the same time Charlie can't moam they posting about her when she gives them stuff privately to.post. it all needs to be kept off social media
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top