Someone was trying to hack tee mum gossip accountWhat is this?
Why has oli deactivated.Charlie seems to be upset her screenshots of Oliver being controlling/mean/whatever have been posted. Begs the question why she sent them in the first place? Obviously for them to of been posted at some point.
Should TMG of posted them in retaliation to Charlie blocking her? Probably not. Does it warrant suicide threats with “blood on your hands” finger pointing at TMG? Does it duck. It’s a desperate attempt to guilt trip TMG into deleting them and albeit TMG’s attitude isn’t the best, neither would mine if someone tried that tit with me!
Charlie seems to be upset her screenshots of Oliver being controlling/mean/whatever have been posted. Begs the question why she sent them in the first place? Obviously for them to of been posted at some point.
Should TMG of posted them in retaliation to Charlie blocking her? Probably not. Does it warrant suicide threats with “blood on your hands” finger pointing at
TMG? Does it duck. It’s a desperate attempt to guilt trip TMG into deleting them and albeit TMG’s attitude isn’t the best, neither would mine if someone tried that tit with me!
This will be his life once he’s married to her I’m sure the lads in camp would rip him to pieces and it will get around about the drama with Charlie she will be frowned upon by the wives you can just picture it the mums stood there gossipingWhy has oli deactivated.
I’m sorry but i think everyone who comments things about the girls on here, don’t give a tit about their mental health. Let’s not pretend TMG isn’t just doing what everyone else would do on here.
She never said that. I agree with the duchess, my experience of working alongside the family courts is that a child would not be removed from their primary caregiver unless the child was at significant harm including emotional abuse. The mother of your stepchildren clearly was harmful to her children.Nope, not an unusual case. Just a very good judge who saw the risk to the childrens best interest.
It's my partner's children, so not like it's my friend's next door neighbour's cat who is telling me all these things. I was actively involved in the case so I saw all the reports including the children's wishes to not move and see both parents for equal time. To state that a court would never remove a child from their primary care giver/mother is just wrong and quite dangerous to be spreading to be honest. Courts are much less mother biased now and work in best interests for the child and it's Harlow's best interest to spend as much time with her father as she does with her mother. If mother is wanting to remove Harlow from her entire family, then the court should take that into consideration and allocate more time to Brett because of proximity to Harlow's family
Brett has Harlow. Thank godMaybe somebody should message brett maybe he could check on her or make sure harlow is OK if she's struggling
Or are more girls going to come forward as it’s all kicking offI'd say oli could be annoyed over charlie's post too tmg or getting a lot of hate his instagram is gone
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.