I can @ you as many times as I like. You aren’t admin so you can’t tell others what they can and can’t do here, do remember that.
3/4 years ago PLouise was a VERY small company with very little budget and very little success, it was only 3 years ago she had to sell her car in order to fund her business, so it’s no wonder she wasn’t as inclusive as she is now.
Most if not all new brands don’t become fully inclusive until they’re more established within the market, even FentyBeauty extended their shade range from 40 - 50. Even MAC to this day are adding new foundation shades to their range to be more inclusive.
Look how many fashion brands that have been out for years are only now bringing out “plus size” or “petite” ranges. Most brands don’t become “inclusive” until they are well established and have a higher budget. Being inclusive costs money.
To expect inclusivity within a small business that doesn’t have the budget as MAC for example is ridiculous. There are huge brands out there like Dior, Chanel, Tarte (they’re much better now), YSL and so on that still to this day aren’t as inclusive as smaller brands.
They really should learn something from brands like PLouise who are collaborating with dark skinned women & having their products recommended by dark skin women such as Jackie Aina. Jackie Aina isn’t one to praise brands that aren’t inclusive, and she praised PLouise, so I guess your definition of “inclusive” as a non person of colour is quite different to my definition of inclusive as a person of colour.
I am referencing the fact you don’t know her because you are calling this girl dumb and lazy as if you know her personally, your comments both here and on the other thread sounded very personal as if they come from someone who knew her, as I said, you have a lot to say and a lot of speculation based on nothing.
What is socially unacceptable about her family? The fact they are working class and don’t happen to have posh accents? Again, you’re welcome to elaborate for us folks who don’t understand your definition of “rough”.
Gangster by definition is “a member of a gang of violent criminals.” It’s not really a word is describe for petty crime. A gangster to me is someone like Al Capone, maybe your definition is different.
It’s funny that you’ve come to the conclusion I’m irate because I happen to disagree with your opinion & insults... In my book anyone who feels the need to call someone “dumb, lazy” and from a “rough family” based on not a lot and call people who follow someone “fan girls” is far more irate and quite aggressive.
Just to clarify, I’m not irate, this is an online platform and you and I are basically nobody’s on a forum, so don’t assume your words about an influencer produce such feelings. They don’t. It’s not that deep.
Lastly, I’m not arguing I’m simply positing and airing my views, as are you.