Have you just deleted a post? I was just going to ask about it.My cousin is an iridologist and she said the thing with Maddies eye is often something she sees with people who have been sexually abused
I did mean it was present visibly from birth, I don’t see how it can possibly be related to sexual abuse.It's a coloboma - occurs before birth
that was a reply to the other person. I highly doubt it has anything to do with sexual abuse. My friends baby has a colobama and they were told he could have heart and lung problems as well as sight issues - luckily he seems to be ok. Wonder if it ties in with the portugese police never recieving her medical records.I did mean it was present visibly from birth, I don’t see how it can possibly be related to sexual abuse.
Sorry but that is complete rubbish. Madeleine had an eye condition called coloboma which occurs during pregnancy https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/condition/colobomaMy cousin is an iridologist and she said the thing with Maddies eye is often something she sees with people who have been sexually abused
Why? What makes you think they drugged them, is there evidence.They’re not dopey and not strangers to pedos. Mates with a few of them including Clement Freud
Because there is another important layer to the story which is being covered up at all costs
Hit the nail on the head
I too read he had child sex offences against him which were whipped from the system. They had dinner with clement Freud in Portugal ( a known paedophile) and a member of the public reported overheating improper sexual remarks made about Maddie by their friends at dinner
Have read this too and it’s very convincing. See also the e-fits of the Podesta brothers who are known Pedos who were in the resort at the same time. They are protected because of the connections to the elites they have. It’s all very dark and very sad. She was an IVF baby and I think she was conceived to be abused
Whilst it’s shocking and repugnant to most people to comprehend it is actually the most plausible story and the one I truly believe.
I spoke to someone pretty high up investigating the case and have it on good authority that’s the truth. They are part of an elite pedalo ring. I’ve spent a lot of time researching ( sad I know) and everything I’ve found supports this. Re the drugging it was documented that the twins slept for 6 hours after she was reported missing and slept through all the commotion which would support the idea they were sedatedWhy? What makes you think they drugged them, is there evidence.
I’ve just watched the first episode. Whilst I think they were clearly negligent I am genuinely wondering where the drugging and left for paedophiles theories come from.
The photos are also odd.
That doesn’t support the young children sleeping and being drugged in the slightest. A trauma happened within our family involving police and ambulances and my 2 and 5 year olds slept through it and they certainly hadn’t been drugged, nor had I left them to go out drinking and eating with friends, but that is a bizarre assumption to base a drugging claim on. Presumably a hair sample was taken and tested? Easily done.I spoke to someone pretty high up investigating the case and have it on good authority that’s the truth. They are part of an elite pedalo ring. I’ve spent a lot of time researching ( sad I know) and everything I’ve found supports this. Re the drugging it was documented that the twins slept for 6 hours after she was reported missing and slept through all the commotion which would support the idea they were sedated
Yeah and I'm one of the tapas 7 and have it on good authority you know nothing except what you've read onlineI spoke to someone pretty high up investigating the case and have it on good authority that’s the truth. They are part of an elite pedalo ring. I’ve spent a lot of time researching ( sad I know) and everything I’ve found supports this. Re the drugging it was documented that the twins slept for 6 hours after she was reported missing and slept through all the commotion which would support the idea they were sedated
5 months later how thick are theyIn the detectives book he says he regrets not screening the twins for drugs and that was a mistake. The McCans suggested testing them five months later, when of course nothing showed because it would have been out of their systems if they had been sedated that night
That’s pretty awful detective work tbh. I’m not a detective and I’d have done that.In the detectives book he says he regrets not screening the twins for drugs and that was a mistake. The McCans suggested testing them five months later, when of course nothing showed because it would have been out of their systems if they had been sedated that night
Would probably still have been worth it with the girl if she had long hair. I know someone who’s hair was tested 4 months after a suspected spiking and it did test positive (can’t remember what the substance was) although most people seem to think they were drugged with calpolThat’s pretty awful detective work tbh. I’m not a detective and I’d have done that.
I think had the police been much better than we wouldn’t all still be speculating
Would probably still have been worth it with the girl if she had long hair. I know someone who’s hair was tested 4 months after a suspected spiking and it did test positive (can’t remember what the substance was) although most people seem to think they were drugged with calpol
I thought they might have been drugged because they must have been pretty damn sure that Madeleine wouldn't wake up and go out the unlocked door.
The twins were in a travel cot. No way at that age would they have been able to climb out to escape awayI think I read on this thread about Gerry saying the doors were open so the kids could all leave the apartment in the event of a fireIf so, wouldn't sedating them all be dangerous in this case? I can't see three small children knowing what to do, anyway... Trying to get my head around this case drives me mad sometimes.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.