Made in Chelsea #8

Weirdest MIC crush?

  • Spencer

    Votes: 29 9.5%

  • Jamie

    Votes: 51 16.7%

  • Julius

    Votes: 5 1.6%

  • Sam P

    Votes: 28 9.2%

  • Sam T

    Votes: 37 12.1%

  • Alik

    Votes: 50 16.4%

  • Ryan

    Votes: 7 2.3%

  • Reza

    Votes: 11 3.6%

  • Mark-Francis

    Votes: 12 3.9%

  • Tristan

    Votes: 54 17.7%

  • Others (please specify in your posts!)

    Votes: 21 6.9%
  • Total voters
    305
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1 Sort by date Sort by reaction score 2
storminaDcup said:
The only things I remember about BINKY:

1. Mark Francis saying something about cellulite in S1 E1 and looking directly at her
2. Alex having orgies (without her being present) 😅
3. Binky would constantly touch her hair and then pout her lips right after. It was almost a nervous tick?
4. Awful taste in men!
Click to expand...
Yes, that bloody bottom lip pursing thing she constantly did. That's what I always associate her with😅And the dodgy extensions. Don't even mention that atrocious wet flannel JP, i.e. Ryan.2🦨I think we saw a true asshole side of Binky when she completely turned on Fran. She got really unnecessarily nasty towards her, I thought.

Did anyone listen to the latest Private Parts with Lucy? Fair play to Alex for agreeing when she effectively said to him "you basically served no purpose on the show other than being the cheating boyfriend and the counsellor". He said he was just there for a good time and spent most of it getting twatted 😂
 
blairwaldorfxo said:
The only things I remember about BINKY:

1. Mark Francis saying something about cellulite in S1 E1 and looking directly at her
2. Alex having orgies (without her being present) 😅
3. Binky would constantly touch her hair and then pout her lips right after. It was almost a nervous tick?
4. Awful taste in men!
Click to expand...
She said she cried after that cellulite comment it was directed at her
Her hair always looked gross
Alex proper took the piss out of her.
couldn’t stand her and JP either calling each other bubba all the time 🤮🤮🤮
 
Such a random thing to post from Ruby?! Her and Nicholas have been very quiet these days! Probably trying to stay low-key after the articles published him about him recently…

Edit: oh, spoke too soon! He’s posted his first stories in a while today… they couldn’t look any more chavvy even if they tried lol.
 

Attachments

  • 03B750D9-4F29-44ED-8EDB-8A2E6AD7E46E.jpeg
    03B750D9-4F29-44ED-8EDB-8A2E6AD7E46E.jpeg
    13.6 KB · Views: 106
  • D5EA6017-0E22-440D-B22C-6571D670E4AF.jpeg
    D5EA6017-0E22-440D-B22C-6571D670E4AF.jpeg
    40.4 KB · Views: 101
Ollie Locke-Locke has been on a podcast (Monday Mile with Amy Fuller) talking about surrogacy struggles. Some quotes...
---

Britain is incredibly difficult, completely backward, they haven't changed the laws on IVF in 34 years and they don't plan on doing so for another three years.

The reason people go abroad to do it is because if you want an egg donor, you can't see their face which is completely ridiculous. And so you have to choose from someone based on what you feel they might look like.

'You know they have green eyes and weigh this much and might be this tall... but you can't see their face, which seems absolutely mad to me.

In America, you can meet them, discuss it and have a contract where you go, "Thank you very much for the eggs." It's a transaction.

'Then there will be no more rights whatsoever so they won't have any rights to the children or anything like that. In England, it's somewhat more difficult.

'If theoretically, our surrogate, who is not biologically related to the baby, in the end she can find to keep it because she gave birth to it.'

Ollie went on to reveal he would love to adopt a child, however has been put off by a negative experience his friends in Spain.

He explained: 'I've spoken to loads of people about it and one of the biggest things they say is, "Why don't you adopt? There are so many children that need adopting."

They're absolutely right and if the government made it slightly easier to do that it would be great. Gay friends of mine did it in Spain, this is heartbreaking, and the little girl is now seven. The mother got in contact and they had to give the girl back.

'These lovely guys have no idea who this woman is except from that she gave birth to her and they've had to give her back.'

'As we move forward I will promise I will do everything in my power to try and bring attention to help in changing the British laws to make it easier for people desperately trying to have a family!

'The rules which haven't been reassessed in over 30 years are wildly unfair, currently firmly against gay equality and beyond archaic.

'Why would any government grant equal marriage, but make it so heartbreakingly difficult and frighteningly expensive to have a family, I will do everything in my power to open up the conversation of a modernisation in legislation change!



---
From DM article.

__________

I can appreciate the pain Ollie & Gareth are going through. They have the want and means to raise a child whereas the people who have 'oops' babies get all the fertility in the world.

However I get how their wording, (Ollie's specifically) gives some of you an uncomfortable feeling. Ollie himself said "it's a transaction".
Egg harvesting alone is strenuous to your body let alone childbirth. The poor surrogate has miscarried 3 times and I feel like they are the ones rushing her to test early etc. They've paid the big bucks but I wonder about her health and feelings and when/if she can back out. There's no way the process can't end up being commercialised. Are they still not obliged to file a parental order in the UK to keep the baby, on the surrogate's permission? That's still a barrier for them.

You can't even sell your blood for profit in the UK so I think it's a long way to fully commercialised surrogacy. It's not a slight to gay couples specifically. I don't think that makes Britain "backwards" - many countries have banned altruistic and commercial surrogacy for good reason. I don't think there's a need to rush the law as there's so much potential to exploit the surrogate in some way.
 
lululoves said:
Ollie Locke-Locke has been on a podcast (Monday Mile with Amy Fuller) talking about surrogacy struggles. Some quotes...
---

Britain is incredibly difficult, completely backward, they haven't changed the laws on IVF in 34 years and they don't plan on doing so for another three years.

The reason people go abroad to do it is because if you want an egg donor, you can't see their face which is completely ridiculous. And so you have to choose from someone based on what you feel they might look like.

'You know they have green eyes and weigh this much and might be this tall... but you can't see their face, which seems absolutely mad to me.

In America, you can meet them, discuss it and have a contract where you go, "Thank you very much for the eggs." It's a transaction.

'Then there will be no more rights whatsoever so they won't have any rights to the children or anything like that. In England, it's somewhat more difficult.

'If theoretically, our surrogate, who is not biologically related to the baby, in the end she can find to keep it because she gave birth to it.'

Ollie went on to reveal he would love to adopt a child, however has been put off by a negative experience his friends in Spain.

He explained: 'I've spoken to loads of people about it and one of the biggest things they say is, "Why don't you adopt? There are so many children that need adopting."

They're absolutely right and if the government made it slightly easier to do that it would be great. Gay friends of mine did it in Spain, this is heartbreaking, and the little girl is now seven. The mother got in contact and they had to give the girl back.

'These lovely guys have no idea who this woman is except from that she gave birth to her and they've had to give her back.'

'As we move forward I will promise I will do everything in my power to try and bring attention to help in changing the British laws to make it easier for people desperately trying to have a family!

'The rules which haven't been reassessed in over 30 years are wildly unfair, currently firmly against gay equality and beyond archaic.

'Why would any government grant equal marriage, but make it so heartbreakingly difficult and frighteningly expensive to have a family, I will do everything in my power to open up the conversation of a modernisation in legislation change!



---
From DM article.

__________

I can appreciate the pain Ollie & Gareth are going through. They have the want and means to raise a child whereas the people who have 'oops' babies get all the fertility in the world.

However I get how their wording, (Ollie's specifically) gives some of you an uncomfortable feeling. Ollie himself said "it's a transaction".
Egg harvesting alone is strenuous to your body let alone childbirth. The poor surrogate has miscarried 3 times and I feel like they are the ones rushing her to test early etc. They've paid the big bucks but I wonder about her health and feelings and when/if she can back out. There's no way the process can't end up being commercialised. Are they still not obliged to file a parental order in the UK to keep the baby, on the surrogate's permission? That's still a barrier for them.

You can't even sell your blood for profit in the UK so I think it's a long way to fully commercialised surrogacy. It's not a slight to gay couples specifically. I don't think that makes Britain "backwards" - many countries have banned altruistic and commercial surrogacy for good reason. I don't think there's a need to rush the law as there's so much potential to exploit the surrogate in some way.
Click to expand...
That's made me really angry. He talks about equal rights as if hetro couples have the right to buy babies.

Women choosing to have babies for themselves is in no way comparable to farming babies and renting women.

And can't see the donors face. So he's desperate for a kid but not if it might be ugly. Twatt.

I hate it when people claim it's gay rights or trans rights or whatever when what they actually want is more rights than everyone else and to be able to step on others to get it.
 
lululoves said:
Gay friends of mine did it in Spain, this is heartbreaking, and the little girl is now seven. The mother got in contact and they had to give the girl back.

'These lovely guys have no idea who this woman is except from that she gave birth to her and they've had to give her back.'
Click to expand...
???? This makes no sense to me. Seven years after she was adopted the birth mother gets her back because she wants her? I would understand within a year maybe but seven? I have no experience with adoption but is this possible??
 
Seems a bit bullshit
So I’ve just done some googling 😂
I’m not sure what the laws are in Spain. But in UK & US think it’s pretty impossible to get your baby back.
consideringadoption.com

If You Regret Adoption, Can You Get Your Child Back? | Considering Adoption

What are your options if, after placing your child for adoption, you regret the decision? Can you get your child back? Here’s what you should know.
consideringadoption.com consideringadoption.com

Not sure why he would make it up but imagine doing the adoptive parents and someone wants their child back7 Years later !??


“Depending on the state you live in and how long it’s been since placement, you may or may not still be able to legally revoke your consent. However, if the legal window of time has already passed, your decision is almost always permanent.” That’s one of the paragraphs
 
I remember watching a film years ago on true movies based on a real story about a girl in america who was adopted I think her Mother wasn't bothered and the Dad not on the scene so gave her up , years later her Dad tracked her down and to cut a long story short they managed to get her back because the Dad never signed the adoption papers as he wasn't around. The adoptive parents were heartbroken , im sure she was the only child they ever had and they couldn't have their own children

Please don't come at me with ways this didn't happen as its nothing to do with me 🤣 I have no idea of the American adoption laws and it was years ago its meant to have happend possibly 80s/90s , just saying what happend in the film and the fact it was supposed to be based on a true story
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top