rememberwayne
VIP Member
Is she? very bland presenter in my opinion, which is not bad, just not really good.She's shtupping a high up Ch 4 executive so she's got a job for life.
Is she? very bland presenter in my opinion, which is not bad, just not really good.She's shtupping a high up Ch 4 executive so she's got a job for life.
I agree. When Nadia, Stacey, Coleen or Denise are on I switch off immediatelyI don't enjoy Loose Women at all anymore, it just isn't as good as it used to be. The only ones I slightly like are Ruth, Kelle, Jane, Janet and Christine.
I agree. When Nadia, Stacey, Coleen or Denise are on I switch off immediately
We really need an eye roll reaction emoji on tattleStacey glamourising losing her kids in Tesco - how relatable
I couldn't even face watching, I am so sick of hearing about the royal familyAnyone else watching behind their fingers? Only 7 minutes in eek
She’s not wrong, but neither is Jane. We can’t pin the whole family as racist when it was one person, and should they be named? I don’t know but it’s a serious allegation. Also Harry was the only one who had the conversation not Meghan and Harry was the one who wouldn’t divulge not Meghan so Charlene is changing the narrative to fit her own argumentYou have to agree with charlene
I just hate that that allegation was made the way it was. I think it was deliberate so that everyone would be wondering who it was whilst also knowing there would be no right of reply. This whole thing just seems very wrong.She’s not wrong, but neither is Jane. We can’t pin the whole family as racist when it was one person, and should they be named? I don’t know but it’s a serious allegation. Also Harry was the only one who had the conversation not Meghan and Harry was the one who wouldn’t divulge not Meghan so Charlene is changing the narrative to fit her own argument
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.