kev1974
VIP Member
Welcome to Thread 49!
Thread title by @margaretta with 39 likes!
Carrying on from here
Please can thread title suggesters try to put the words "thread title" somewhere in the post or at least "title" as otherwise it is really hard to find the suggestions when creating the new thread! Tea trays will fly all over the place if a good suggestion gets overlooked because it didn't come up in the search
In the last pages of the last thread we learnt that poor privacy-seeking Meghan announced her miscarriage to the globe through an article that she vomited up to the New York Times herself. When asked for a comment about it Buck House responded rather tellingly that they were "saddened by the announcement" and left it at that. See what they did there?
I've just seen this on the Mail, I'm not sure why charities are praising her, since she had the opportunity to point sufferers at any number of these charities but didn't, she kept it all about her and only her. Maybe they think she will become their patron if they praise her? Will these charities never learn
Thread title by @margaretta with 39 likes!
Carrying on from here
Harry & Meghan #48 Malicious Meg thought she knew better, getting help with her letter
I can only imagine that if a Disney film included a miscarriage, her description is exactly how it would be . I’m suprised forest animals weren’t there to lift her to her feet whilst she hummed bravely , staring into yonder ...
tattle.life
Please can thread title suggesters try to put the words "thread title" somewhere in the post or at least "title" as otherwise it is really hard to find the suggestions when creating the new thread! Tea trays will fly all over the place if a good suggestion gets overlooked because it didn't come up in the search
In the last pages of the last thread we learnt that poor privacy-seeking Meghan announced her miscarriage to the globe through an article that she vomited up to the New York Times herself. When asked for a comment about it Buck House responded rather tellingly that they were "saddened by the announcement" and left it at that. See what they did there?
I've just seen this on the Mail, I'm not sure why charities are praising her, since she had the opportunity to point sufferers at any number of these charities but didn't, she kept it all about her and only her. Maybe they think she will become their patron if they praise her? Will these charities never learn
https://www.12ft.io/https://www.dai...aise-Meghan-Markle-breaking-stigma-shame.html
Last edited: