Harry and Meghan #454 Fakery, Fauxlanthropy & Fuquery

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
Chita

Chita

VIP Member
Title by @Who’sYerDaddy

Old thread here - https://tattle.life/threads/harry-meghan-453-nowhere-near-the-action-man.46023/
in which we discussed that couple of grifting people in Montecito and also Princess Catherine appearing at Wimbledon and getting a standing ovation that wasn't paid for or ordered to happen. It was organic.
Just like Meghan's dead lemons and jam slop.
---
Ive been revisiting the folder on my laptop that contains all of my Tattle cartoons.

And as lots of Political stuff is in the news I thought I would re-post this one. It was inspired by all that nonsense about her running for Presidential office.....

presidential debate TEXT ON watermarked.jpg
 
Last edited:
Thanks @Chita and @Who'YerDaddy

The Stoat knew the consequences of deleting evidence, and will have discussed it with his solicitors in advance.

Nobody's asked why he "deleted" it. If it was to conceal his "prior knowledge" this is odd if it's on record that Charles wrote to him about it at the time, and that Harald as good as told Moehringer about it.

The rest of the stuff was deleted in one hit, that TPTB didn't want in the hands of NGN lawyers. Omitted details in the drafts of Spare could include Diana's death, his stepmother, Savile a fixture when he and William were young, arrangements for the fake christening, Welby.
The Stoat's "prior knowledge lying" pales into comparison beside this danger.

Not only will he not pay NGN fees, he'll have benefited. I'm on my own with this opinion no doubt, but it was a clever strategy and has virtually shut it down. The Stoat retains the 400 cut-out pages for his future use, and the solicitors will write in vain to TPTB asking for data.

It's a fait accompli, and we're already discussing the "penalties" for his contempt of court. A slap on the wrist already factored in, but a win for them imo.
 
And here's another.
I've chosen this one because they have recently been reported as complaining that everyone shows them in a bad light. Its never their own fault, is it?
And as 'waagh' was coined by South Park and there are rumours a part 2 of their worldwide privacy tour is in the pipeline, I thought this cartoon is very apt....

waagh mr and mrs WATERMARKED.jpg
 
Thank you for the shiny new thread and title! Glad to see your cartoons again, @Chita ☺

Been busy with work and work shirkers, so haven't been able to keep up much, especially since my phone keeps dying a bit more all the time - I swear I didn't receive any jam from Smegs! 😂 Guess mentioning her was enough 😂

We finally had a bit of rain so the rain lilies put up a bit of a show. Enjoy!


IMG_20240707_083446814~2.jpg


P.s. I keep receiving the weirdest headlines in my notifications - looks like the Gruesomes' handiwork. Waiting to get the phone fixed so I can share those. Some are absolutely ridiculous 🤦
 



Guys! This is actually really insane.

This is the woman Harry betrayed his family for. He is definitely going to regret this. Imagine a man running around telling teenagers that he has fucked your wife. And you are arrogantly destroying your family and everyone who tried to warn you... FOR HER.

I mean...

Context:

The lawsuit filed on Monday in Washington County Court was brought by Elizabeth Kennedy, a 13-year employee who worked most recently as the private military school’s vice president of development and alumni relations. It says Kennedy repeatedly blew the whistle on her boss, former Norwich President Mark Anarumo, for “years of misconduct and creation of sex-based discriminatory employment conditions.”

The suit alleges Anarumo “regularly engaged in inappropriate sexual behavior, made inappropriate sexual comments, and otherwise directed inappropriate verbal and physical treatment toward women.”

Kennedy also accuses Dave Whaley, the predecessor in her job, of making sexist and offensive comments reflecting his biased views about women in the workplace.


The part about Meghan:

1721326375340.png



She had a life before him, yes. And women are allowed to enjoy sex but, gosh this is so icky. A feminist having a one-night stand with a pervert... Gross.

This is him:

1721326870581.png



Here is the lawsuit for all those who want to go over it. Page 5.

 
Cinnamon.girl said:
Thanks @Chita and @Who'YerDaddy

The Stoat knew the consequences of deleting evidence, and will have discussed it with his solicitors in advance.

Nobody's asked why he "deleted" it. If it was to conceal his "prior knowledge" this is odd if it's on record that Charles wrote to him about it at the time, and that Harald as good as told Moehringer about it.

The rest of the stuff was deleted in one hit, that TPTB didn't want in the hands of NGN lawyers. Omitted details in the drafts of Spare could include Diana's death, his stepmother, Savile a fixture when he and William were young, arrangements for the fake christening, Welby.
The Stoat's "prior knowledge lying" pales into comparison beside this danger.

Not only will he not pay NGN fees, he'll have benefited. I'm on my own with this opinion no doubt, but it was a clever strategy and has virtually shut it down. The Stoat retains the 400 cut-out pages for his future use, and the solicitors will write in vain to TPTB asking for data.

It's a fait accompli, and we're already discussing the "penalties" for his contempt of court. A slap on the wrist already factored in, but a win for them imo.
Click to expand...
But he didn't need to delete it to stop NGN having access. All he needed to do was the same as Hugh Grant and decide not to continue with the Court case.
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top