Harry and Meghan #113 threatening another lawsuit, the media needs to put them on mute
- Thread starter buflesse
- Start date
-
- Tags
- harry and meghan
- Status
1
me from mid-America
Active member
This is a good one…top of website.
nypost.com
‘They make it too easy.
Just three months after Harry and Meghan sat with Oprah to tell the world that the Queen’s racist palace drove Meghan to suicidal impulses — then denied her help she begged for, along with Harry publicly blaming the royal family for inflicting him with decades of “genetic pain” — these two go and name their daughter after the 95-year-old Evil Queen.
And they didn’t just choose her birth name — no, they hijacked the very specific childhood nickname only used by the Queen’s closest and most beloved: Lilibet.
Of course, Harry and Meghan said, they cleared this with the Queen personally and in advance.
Plot twist: The Palace denies this. And this denial isn’t coming from some random blogger or blind item website. These are Palace sources talking to the BBC. After a year-plus of these two and their shenanigans, accusations and outright whoppers, who are you inclined to believe?
Casting aside their choice of Diana as a middle name (who could possibly begrudge them that?) naming their only daughter after the woman who they deride as the epitome of racism, colonialism and, by extension, mean mommydom is odd, right?
Except when you consider the Palace’s recent demotion of Haz and Megs on the official royal website. Once listed just below William and Kate, Harry and Meghan were kicked all the way to the bottom, below even the Epstein-associated Prince Andrew.’
more at link
Just keep digging, Harry and Meghan!
Three months after Harry and Meghan sat with Oprah to tell the world that the Queen’s racist palace drove Meghan to suicidal impulses, these two go and name their daughter after the 95-year-old Que…
nypost.com
‘They make it too easy.
Just three months after Harry and Meghan sat with Oprah to tell the world that the Queen’s racist palace drove Meghan to suicidal impulses — then denied her help she begged for, along with Harry publicly blaming the royal family for inflicting him with decades of “genetic pain” — these two go and name their daughter after the 95-year-old Evil Queen.
And they didn’t just choose her birth name — no, they hijacked the very specific childhood nickname only used by the Queen’s closest and most beloved: Lilibet.
Of course, Harry and Meghan said, they cleared this with the Queen personally and in advance.
Plot twist: The Palace denies this. And this denial isn’t coming from some random blogger or blind item website. These are Palace sources talking to the BBC. After a year-plus of these two and their shenanigans, accusations and outright whoppers, who are you inclined to believe?
Casting aside their choice of Diana as a middle name (who could possibly begrudge them that?) naming their only daughter after the woman who they deride as the epitome of racism, colonialism and, by extension, mean mommydom is odd, right?
Except when you consider the Palace’s recent demotion of Haz and Megs on the official royal website. Once listed just below William and Kate, Harry and Meghan were kicked all the way to the bottom, below even the Epstein-associated Prince Andrew.’
more at link
Carpediem69
VIP Member
Found this
www.nowtolove.com.au
from 2019
The Duchess of Sussex's fall from grace has reached a new low, with rumours surfacing royal aides have a secret recording of her ranting about Prince William and Kate.
According to palace sources, Meghan, 37, is furious her unborn child is unlikely to receive a His or Her Royal Highness title like the Cambridges' three children.
This latest in a spate of supposed meltdowns is further proof to many the former actress is now showing her "true colours" and her behaviour until now has been "one big act". It also implies Meghan marrying into the royal family was always part of her grand plan to become a huge star.
Lord or lady
With less than three months until Meghan's due date, the Queen has yet to decree whether Prince Harry and Meghan's offspring will be given an HRH title, with palace insiders tipping their kids will be lords and ladies rather than princes or princesses.
This is in stark contrast to the Queen announcing William and Kate's offspring would all be bestowed with HRH titles while she was six months pregnant with Prince George.
"Meghan can't believe their children are being snubbed like this," says a source.
"She feels she's being punished by the royal family for not fitting in as perfectly as everyone wanted her to, but she refuses to conform to stuffy palace politics.
Duchess Meghan’s true colours shine through as her biggest meltdown yet is caught on tape!
Her fall from grace has reached a new low.
www.nowtolove.com.au
from 2019
The Duchess of Sussex's fall from grace has reached a new low, with rumours surfacing royal aides have a secret recording of her ranting about Prince William and Kate.
According to palace sources, Meghan, 37, is furious her unborn child is unlikely to receive a His or Her Royal Highness title like the Cambridges' three children.
This latest in a spate of supposed meltdowns is further proof to many the former actress is now showing her "true colours" and her behaviour until now has been "one big act". It also implies Meghan marrying into the royal family was always part of her grand plan to become a huge star.
Lord or lady
With less than three months until Meghan's due date, the Queen has yet to decree whether Prince Harry and Meghan's offspring will be given an HRH title, with palace insiders tipping their kids will be lords and ladies rather than princes or princesses.
This is in stark contrast to the Queen announcing William and Kate's offspring would all be bestowed with HRH titles while she was six months pregnant with Prince George.
"Meghan can't believe their children are being snubbed like this," says a source.
"She feels she's being punished by the royal family for not fitting in as perfectly as everyone wanted her to, but she refuses to conform to stuffy palace politics.
Evangelina
VIP Member
keylimepie
VIP Member
SnickerOnTheFritz
Member
me from mid-America
Active member
I’m writing a book. Just my opinions. It’s about the Rescue chickens.
I’m calling it …”Comfort in the Henhouse.”
(Any volunteers for an illustrator.)
‘The chickens still like you.
Go off to their coop !
But we are immune now
To you and your ‘truth.’
We find you distasteful
Petty and mean.
But In poultry circles
You’re still King and Queen.
Your rescue initiatives
Cannot be denied
Without your intervention
They’d be roasted or fried.
You saved them from meanies
Now they drop eggs so well
But the slime that you’re ‘dropping’
Has that rotten egg smell.
Your compassion for pullets
Is well known in the Roost
But the way you treat Granny
Seems like elder abuse
But…If your Titles are taken
Reputations besmirched
You’ll still have that rooster
Maybe he can be ‘merched.’
Please, head to the Hen House
Where your Fan club is perching…
And give us some peace
From your whining and merch-ing.
I’m calling it …”Comfort in the Henhouse.”
(Any volunteers for an illustrator.)
‘The chickens still like you.
Go off to their coop !
But we are immune now
To you and your ‘truth.’
We find you distasteful
Petty and mean.
But In poultry circles
You’re still King and Queen.
Your rescue initiatives
Cannot be denied
Without your intervention
They’d be roasted or fried.
You saved them from meanies
Now they drop eggs so well
But the slime that you’re ‘dropping’
Has that rotten egg smell.
Your compassion for pullets
Is well known in the Roost
But the way you treat Granny
Seems like elder abuse
But…If your Titles are taken
Reputations besmirched
You’ll still have that rooster
Maybe he can be ‘merched.’
Please, head to the Hen House
Where your Fan club is perching…
And give us some peace
From your whining and merch-ing.
leviosa
Well-known member
I don't even know where to start. I'm a massive huge bibliophile, my house is literally filled with books (poor old Mr Leviosa) but not ONE book has only the title of the author on its spine. It's so obvious this is yet another vanity project. It's so hard to become a published author in this day and age. Despite my feelings about her, even JK Rowling was rejected by several publishers before Bloomsbury picked up HP. In the face of true talent you have Meghan cashing in on connections to get this trite, twee tripe published. Must be awful for her to be so maligned and hated that all her opportunities are blocked.
The name is shocking. I agree with many here who said that Harry probably said "we'll name her after you" but carefully didn't get specific. Quite aside from that (and this is my own personal preference) childrens' first names imo shouldn't be directly after a person. Do middle names all you like but I always feel first names give the poor child something to live up to before they're even started, and who on earth could live up to the Queen! Plus what will they tell Archie in years to come? His sister was named after two special people but he wasn't? They really don't think any further than the end of their noses.
The name is shocking. I agree with many here who said that Harry probably said "we'll name her after you" but carefully didn't get specific. Quite aside from that (and this is my own personal preference) childrens' first names imo shouldn't be directly after a person. Do middle names all you like but I always feel first names give the poor child something to live up to before they're even started, and who on earth could live up to the Queen! Plus what will they tell Archie in years to come? His sister was named after two special people but he wasn't? They really don't think any further than the end of their noses.
Rayne
VIP Member
I’ve gotten a hat trick of thread titles thanks peasants for voting.
Not to blow my own trumpet but I am available to write poetry incase the “best selling children’s author in the fiction about values and virtues” made up amazon category is lurking on this thread and needs help with the sequel to her flop, the bench
the musician
Chatty Member
https://www.12ft.io/https://www.dai...KAY-Harry-Meghan-call-lawyers-babys-name.html
The story's still managed to make a few of the front pages too. Guess their threats didn't work.
Last edited:
the little butterfly
Well-known member
Pray they get brought down soon, wish they’d leak the recording soon and hope her dad tells it as it is.. fame hungry money grabbing nutter, well suited to Haz pair of lying nasty toxic vindictive B’sFound this
Duchess Meghan’s true colours shine through as her biggest meltdown yet is caught on tape!
Her fall from grace has reached a new low.
from 2019
The Duchess of Sussex's fall from grace has reached a new low, with rumours surfacing royal aides have a secret recording of her ranting about Prince William and Kate.
According to palace sources, Meghan, 37, is furious her unborn child is unlikely to receive a His or Her Royal Highness title like the Cambridges' three children.
This latest in a spate of supposed meltdowns is further proof to many the former actress is now showing her "true colours" and her behaviour until now has been "one big act". It also implies Meghan marrying into the royal family was always part of her grand plan to become a huge star.
Lord or lady
With less than three months until Meghan's due date, the Queen has yet to decree whether Prince Harry and Meghan's offspring will be given an HRH title, with palace insiders tipping their kids will be lords and ladies rather than princes or princesses.
This is in stark contrast to the Queen announcing William and Kate's offspring would all be bestowed with HRH titles while she was six months pregnant with Prince George.
"Meghan can't believe their children are being snubbed like this," says a source.
"She feels she's being punished by the royal family for not fitting in as perfectly as everyone wanted her to, but she refuses to conform to stuffy palace politics.
QuackenRevived
Member
I actually think the TRF are handling this just fine. It comes across to me that the pair of them have fallen for the long running media portrayal that has implied for decades now… everyone loves the Queen, the DOE always says embarrassing things, wish we could skip Charles and go straight to William… and isn’t William a bit boring compared to cheeky chappy Harry. Everything they’ve done fits the narrative of wanting people to wish they would be next after the Queen. But they’ve overplayed it (just a bit 
and then some!) and have almost gone into to verbal “terrorist” mode… which automatically over time will flip 95% of British population into “Blitz” mentality and people will stop enjoying a “bit of a moan” about the establishment and will rally behind TRF.
I think that’s why there is such a big fight about whether the Queen truly granted permission for the baby to be named Lilibet. If she did, then they can imply she’s supporting their position that they love her and she them & isn’t it a shame the rest of the people in the line of succession before them exist. If she didn’t then they risk their whole gambit being massively weakened. It feels like TRF realise this which is why they have made their feelings clear on this one particular matter today.
It also explains the total tantrum comments about how she doesn’t own the word royal and anyone can have a life of service.
People I know, who were previously on the fence about it all, are opening mocking them now. It’s clear they didn’t want to break free at all but want to be viewed as the more amazing ones.
I’d be astonished if my parents in law don’t score highly on the narassism scale: when my husband and I naively tried to explain what they did and why it hurt we just came across as petty and silly. When we got some counselling support and “grey rock”ed his parents and kept our thoughts to ourselves… everyone suddenly started seeing their game playing themselves. It was fascinating to see how being neutral and calm works so well as a strategy. Clearly TRF approach I feel and one I have found works well myself. Takes time but works.
and then some!) and have almost gone into to verbal “terrorist” mode… which automatically over time will flip 95% of British population into “Blitz” mentality and people will stop enjoying a “bit of a moan” about the establishment and will rally behind TRF.I think that’s why there is such a big fight about whether the Queen truly granted permission for the baby to be named Lilibet. If she did, then they can imply she’s supporting their position that they love her and she them & isn’t it a shame the rest of the people in the line of succession before them exist. If she didn’t then they risk their whole gambit being massively weakened. It feels like TRF realise this which is why they have made their feelings clear on this one particular matter today.
It also explains the total tantrum comments about how she doesn’t own the word royal and anyone can have a life of service.
People I know, who were previously on the fence about it all, are opening mocking them now. It’s clear they didn’t want to break free at all but want to be viewed as the more amazing ones.
I’d be astonished if my parents in law don’t score highly on the narassism scale: when my husband and I naively tried to explain what they did and why it hurt we just came across as petty and silly. When we got some counselling support and “grey rock”ed his parents and kept our thoughts to ourselves… everyone suddenly started seeing their game playing themselves. It was fascinating to see how being neutral and calm works so well as a strategy. Clearly TRF approach I feel and one I have found works well myself. Takes time but works.
Libbie
VIP Member
How lovely 
www.telegraph.co.uk
Queen marks Duke of Edinburgh’s 100th birthday with rose in his name
The monarch received the gift from the Royal Horticultural Society and watched it placed in the Windsor Castle gardens
- Status