I remember when they would pick an artist and then they'd sing 6 songs and the public would vote. That was back in the days when we used to do quite well.
I think the British public should have some say in who or what represents them. I don't like the BBC arbitrarily deciding on our behalf. OK someone has to prepare a shortlist of singers/songs but if we had a TV show like the Swedish do and invested more in finding new talent I believe we'd do better. There's loads of talented singer songwriters in the UK who are not given a chance.
It's like the juries got together and decided "lets all vote for that neutral country that nobody has a problem with". Giving Switzerland a pretty much unsurmountable lead to avoid any controversial winner. Especially as they would have known the semi final results, in which Israel won and Switzerland only came 4th.I feel by voting for Switzerland, the juries thought they’d meet the audience halfway. Nemo isn’t a typical juries winner at all imho and I bet they thought that after last year, they couldn’t vote for another obvious radio-friendly choice. I knew they wouldn’t go for Croatia as their number 1, so Switzerland probably seemed like a good choice to them. Maybe, like me, they thought audiences would give more points to Croatia and make them the winner. But 300+ points to Israel were obviously more important to international audiences
Wasn’t Sam pushed by Scott Mills or something?I'm generalising a lot here but many of the Eurovision performers come from their country's equivalent of The Voice, X Factor etc. But I feel like the UK is bored of those shows and for good reason.
I liked Olly's performance but I don't really know where the UK goes next. Sam Ryder felt like an anomaly at this point there is so much talent in the UK but we can never get it quite right.
And Ronnie from Eastenders gave it a bash one year as well!Oh yeah back when Katie Price gave it a go.
Yeah, they need to go back to letting the UK public decide who and the song from a small selection.
I loved Scooch - ‘would you like something to suck on for landing?’
The juries don’t know the semi final resultsIt's like the juries got together and decided "lets all vote for that neutral country that nobody has a problem with". Giving Switzerland a pretty much unsurmountable lead to avoid any controversial winner. Especially as they would have known the semi final results, in which Switzerland only came 4th.
I remember that too! Milk & Honey!My 1st memory was Irsael winning in 1979! I was too young to realise it was a contest but I remember 'Hallelujah' clearly!
The noisy minority are not reflective of the general public and the result across Europe reflects that.
I remember reading Sam picked up a lot of traction on social media and also tiktok in particular. So if we can just find someone who ticks all those boxes, has the most popular song, as well as technically on point, that would be greatWasn’t Sam pushed by Scott Mills or something?
Says a lot that someone who’s involved in the Eurovision bubble was able to push someone who was able to do well
How was it filmed? I coukdnt work that bit out- were they moving or the box? Was it flat or stood up?yeah it was really off. Enjoyed watching how the filmed it though. I thought the box was moving
It was a better song than Niamh Kavanagh's to be fair.
In the 80s, UK and Ireland (one or both of them) did well, as in at least top 5. Probably because at the time only they were allowed sing in English. I do get the feeling we're viewing as somewhat 'outsiders' these days. Between us twelve wins I think?I think the problem is the UK rarely submits anyone who is 'likeable'. Sam Ryder did so well because his personality shone through, in all of his interviews he appeared genuinely pleasant and popular amongst the other contestants. I think he appeared legitimately happy and proud to be there, scrapping that image of the UK being embarrassed by even turning up. Very few other UK acts have been able to achieve that.
I think that charisma is much more important than any 'big name' we could submit!
Also, Sam was completely unironic about the whole thing. He looked like he was having the time of his life and was totally on board with Eurovision. He actually took it seriously. Whereas a lot of British acts come across as being a bit above it all, like Eurovision is beneath them or something. Even Olly gave the impression at times that, as an established act, he would just swoop in and wow everyone, like Eurovision was his for the taking. Audiences don’t like that.I think the problem is the UK rarely submits anyone who is 'likeable'. Sam Ryder did so well because his personality shone through, in all of his interviews he appeared genuinely pleasant and popular amongst the other contestants. I think he appeared legitimately happy and proud to be there, scrapping that image of the UK being embarrassed by even turning up. Very few other UK acts have been able to achieve that.
I think that charisma is much more important than any 'big name' we could submit!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.