Eastenders #29 Denise's D is buried with Keanu, while Jack's burying his D in Stacey

Shag Marry Kill: Phil, Nish, Ravi

  • Kill Phil, Shag Nish, Marry Ravi

    Votes: 68 30.6%

  • Kill Ravi, Shag Phil, Marry Nish

    Votes: 2 0.9%

  • Kill Nish, Shag Ravi, Marry Phil

    Votes: 30 13.5%

  • Kill Phil, Shag Ravi, Marry Nish

    Votes: 13 5.9%

  • Kill Ravi, Shag Nish, Marry Phil

    Votes: 14 6.3%

  • Kill Nish, Shag Ravi, Marry Phil

    Votes: 34 15.3%

  • Kill them all

    Votes: 25 11.3%

  • Fuck this, we're having a gangbang!

    Votes: 44 19.8%
  • Total voters
    222
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1 Sort by date Sort by reaction score 2
I’d like to see Priya and Ravi get married with a traditional Asian wedding. I’m surprised Nish hasn’t suggested it (or maybe he will get his wicked way with Priya?) anyway I’m sure they would all look stunning.

Here is a pic of the world’s most handsome Arab man with his blue steel look 😜
IMG_3594.jpeg
 
Timz said:
I’d like to see Priya and Ravi get married with a traditional Asian wedding. I’m surprised Nish hasn’t suggested it (or maybe he will get his wicked way with Priya?) anyway I’m sure they would all look stunning.

Here is a pic of the world’s most handsome Arab man with his blue steel look 😜
View attachment 2747009
Click to expand...
Priya would be stunning but I don't get "traditional" vibes from her 😂
 
Muchbee said:
Priya would be stunning but I don't get "traditional" vibes from her 😂
Click to expand...
That’s what I meant, she would look stunning in traditional wedding clothes, whether that’s a white dress or a heavy bridal outfit. No doubt she’d be back to her usual self in mini skirts and gobby mouth the next day 😂
 
To be honest I'm a bit disappointed with the way that George story is going so far. I thought the baby farming was interesting but now we are all supposed to believe that Eddie is a dedicated racist so why would they have taken on a non white child?

Yes they were being paid for looking after George but foster carers are paid by the local authority for any child they look after. There wouldn't have been a shortage of white babies to look after at that time.

From what I've read some of the farmed babies weren't treated as well as they should have been being made to feel second best in the family. Surely it would have been better to just keep to that rather than Eddie suddenly being outed as not only a racist but a murderer as well 🙄

It would be more effective if George had a white sibling who had received better treatment. That in itself would have been a sad story.

Plus the fact that Eddie is so obviously objectionable, no subtlety there. Pah
 
Scotch Mist said:
To be honest I'm a bit disappointed with the way that George story is going so far. I thought the baby farming was interesting but now we are all supposed to believe that Eddie is a dedicated racist so why would they have taken on a non white child?

Yes they were being paid for looking after George but foster carers are paid by the local authority for any child they look after. There wouldn't have been a shortage of white babies to look after at that time.

From what I've read some of the farmed babies weren't treated as well as they should have been being made to feel second best in the family. Surely it would have been better to just keep to that rather than Eddie suddenly being outed as not only a racist but a murderer as well 🙄

It would be more effective if George had a white sibling who had received better treatment. That in itself would have been a sad story.

Plus the fact that Eddie is so obviously objectionable, no subtlety there. Pah
Click to expand...

Agreed. I would prefer if they unpacked the farming story a little more. Maybe it's a case of his dad committing the murder around the time they adopted George and he's always been his "insurance"? I'm imagining this murder wasn't recent due to his age.

Bit of a long game though 😆

And I can't connect how the dad is so racist he was involved in a racially motivated murder, but also not overtly racist enough that his own son can't see it. I get some people are in denial but it's not even like George downplays or begrudgingly acknowledges his dad's views, he flat out claims not to notice and makes excuses.

But I suppose it's better for the storyline that George is naive, even if it's quite unbelievable 😒, because I'm sure we're about to see him come to that realisation then agonise over whether he backs his dad or not.

That seems to be the way with a lot of the recent Eastenders storylines. It feels like the writers start with a set conclusion or outcome, then work backwards to make the details fit.
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top