CBS Oprah interview - Meghan Markle & Prince Harry

1 Sort by date Sort by reaction score 2
Saying she never googled Harry and was too naive and not knowing who he was for me is where she loses all credibility. Especially when you consider he behavior and comments on her blog about researching people etc, before even meeting Harry. Playing the innocent victim one step too far. It's all very vague, and the comment on Kate (knowing she can't respond) is convenient.
 
nrs264 said:
Saying she never googled Harry and was too naive and not knowing who he was for me is where she loses all credibility. Especially when you consider he behavior and comments on her blog about researching people etc, before even meeting Harry. Playing the innocent victim one step too far. It's all very vague, and the comment on Kate (knowing she can't respond) is convenient.
Click to expand...
She knew exactly who Harry was! She's been obsessed with his mother since she was a child
 
None of the stuff I've seen seems to match up. She left because archie didn't get a royal title but surely she should have known that it was always only the eldest son's children who was going to get a title because they changed the rule after Princess eugenie and Beatrice were born? They thought the British taxpayers should fund their security after they chose to go and live elsewhere? Erm no thanks hun. Him saying her being like his mum is gross tbh. Also they talk about her being refused counselling by the Royal family but Harry's said he's been in counselling for years?? I think the bit about him being too dark is awful but what are we meant to do about it? Genuinely what are we meant to do? What was the purpose of this interview? No one I know in real life cares and its not exactly like we're all going to storm the Palace.
 
Piers Morgan is a painful watch this morning. Absolutely hate the man.

I’m interested to watch the interview and also see how the palace respond. I really quite like Harry and Meghan and don’t blame them for stepping back with how the press have treated her.

I am shocked about the revelation that they had a private wedding 3 days before the televised one. A bit of a slap in the face for everyone that was so excited to see the royal wedding, which wasn’t really the royal wedding.
 
I haven't watched yet but from the comments, it does sound like theres an attempt to sort of frame Meghan as the new Diana.

There a few things that don't quite work for me on this though. Allegedly, much of Diana's unhappiness came from being unsupported by her husband - Meghan has that. Also Diana was incredibly young whereas Meghan is more mature and has even been married before. I also do not believe she didn't know anything about the Royals or the Royal family - Diana passing away alone was a global news story that still echoes today.

The racist comments around Archie's skin tone are gross. That's absolutely awful.
 
sephylily said:
None of the stuff I've seen seems to match up. She left because archie didn't get a royal title but surely she should have known that it was always only the eldest son's children who was going to get a title because they changed the rule after Princess eugenie and Beatrice were born? They thought the British taxpayers should fund their security after they chose to go and live elsewhere? Erm no thanks hun. Him saying her being like his mum is gross tbh. Also they talk about her being refused counselling by the Royal family but Harry's said he's been in counselling for years?? I think the bit about him being too dark is awful but what are we meant to do about it? Genuinely what are we meant to do? What was the purpose of this interview? No one I know in real life cares and its not exactly like we're all going to storm the Palace.
Click to expand...

they don’t expect anyone to do anything lol, they’ve been censored for a long time and even to a point this interview a lot still probably be held back. It wasn’t ever meant to be a tell all, a lot of people wanted to hear from them and this is probably the first time they’ve been able to do it.

whether or not it’s taxpayers money you’d think they’d want some security for people in their family but I guess not and we can probably imagine why🥴
 
uglybettybetty said:
I think it’s important that we as the general public know about it. The royal family are awful. They have deep dark secrets, they’re nothing like the image they portray to the world.
Click to expand...
Well we all know this already. We know this because we saw Diana's death. We already know they are racist, Harry included. I don't know a single person who believes the royal family doesn't have deep dark secrets. This interview made absolutely no difference to that.
ChattyAuntPatty said:
they don’t expect anyone to do anything lol, they’ve been censored for a long time and even to a point this interview a lot still probably be held back. It wasn’t ever meant to be a tell all, a lot of people wanted to hear from them and this is probably the first time they’ve been able to do it.

whether or not it’s taxpayers money you’d think they’d want some security for people in their family but I guess not and we can probably imagine why🥴
Click to expand...
Well if they don't expect anyone to do anything why do the interview? Nobody seems to know what the purpose of it is under then to give the media something to talk about.

If they wanted security for their family then they should've funded it. It being taxpayers money does make a difference as Harry's had his entire life funded by British taxpayers. Its unfair to expect taxpayers to once again foot the bill for his lifestyle choices.
 
It’s all very one-sided since the Royal Family likely won’t be able to respond with their version of events. Also felt like she was acting and wants to portray herself as the new Diana. They wanted titles for their children but then they didn’t? They wanted privacy now they’re on Oprah? Which is it?

I’m not overly invested in this spectacle, nor the royals themselves, but I think they’ve just burned all their bridges with the RF with that interview.
 
I too am unsure what the real purpose of the interview was to be honest. I'll definitely be tuning in though! Although I am finding it very interesting reading other peoples views (it's nice for it to be a two sided debate on here, rather than in other places where it just feels like a hate campaign towards Meghan).
 
sephylily said:
Well if they don't expect anyone to do anything why do the interview? Nobody seems to know what the purpose of it is under then to give the media something to talk about.
Click to expand...

who says it needs to be taxpayers money, I’m sure they have money for themselves and the purpose of the interview is that A LOT of people wanted to hear from Harry and Meghan without the censorship of TRF and they’ve got it. It doesn’t need to big a big song and dance. They were basically asked to interview and they said yes

LittleMy said:
It’s all very one-sided since the Royal Family likely won’t be able to respond with their version of events. Also felt like she was acting and wants to portray herself as the new Diana. They wanted titles for their children but then they didn’t? They wanted privacy now they’re on Oprah? Which is it?
Click to expand...

“It’s very one-sided” and that’s what the press did Meghan from the start it was all one-sided from their view. Now I guess this interview is to hear from Meghan.

“They wanted privacy” as in they get to control of what they want to share and they want to be open in a way they see fit.

Anywaysssss people are so concerned about Harry and Meghan like there’s not a whole n*nce in the family that they should be spending time sorting out
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top