Baby Reindeer Netflix #3

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1 Sort by date Sort by reaction score 2
New to this thread, just watched the interview. I am worrying that I'm either really dumb or gullible or both as I thought she came across credible to me 😱.

I do believe there's an element of truth to BR but also it's a dramatisation. Richard Gadd, who by his own admission and a big part of his own version of the story, was desperate for fame. I don't think his Netflix big break can be seen as reliable testimony and would love to see this go to court.

What I'm struggling to reconcile is the lady I was watching on screen with Piers to me seemed relatively together, composed, eloquent under pressure (this is not someone used to TV interviews) with the Facebook posts and tweets littered with erratic spelling. As Piers said she's clearly bright, so why does she type in a way that doesn't mirror how she talks or her education?

Is the Facebook profile with the flowers profile pic definitely her?

Prior to her interview having watched BR and seen her X account and FB I took it as likely mostly true. But I found the interview gave me doubts whereas most of you seem to feel it only confirmed to you that's she is not well. I'm wondering why I interpret it differently? My husband says it's because I'm crazy too 🤪
 
Lovestolurk said:
New to this thread, just watched the interview. I am worrying that I'm either really dumb or gullible or both as I thought she came across credible to me 😱.

I do believe there's an element of truth to BR but also it's a dramatisation. Richard Gadd, who by his own admission and a big part of his own version of the story, was desperate for fame. I don't think his Netflix big break can be seen as reliable testimony and would love to see this go to court.

What I'm struggling to reconcile is the lady I was watching on screen with Piers to me seemed relatively together, composed, eloquent under pressure (this is not someone used to TV interviews) with the Facebook posts and tweets littered with erratic spelling. As Piers said she's clearly bright, so why does she type in a way that doesn't mirror how she talks or her education?

Is the Facebook profile with the flowers profile pic definitely her?

Prior to her interview having watched BR and seen her X account and FB I took it as likely mostly true. But I found the interview gave me doubts whereas most of you seem to feel it only confirmed to you that's she is not well. I'm wondering why I interpret it differently? My husband says it's because I'm crazy too 🤪
Click to expand...

no her Facebook has a picture of her it has 7 followers on it.
 
judgejohndeed said:
I reckon she’s done the emails, voicemails etc - simply because it would be extremely strange to give such precise numbers, Gadd knows it could be checked, and she also has admitted to sending ‘a few’ which is thousands if anything like her fb posts. But not convinced she’s violent or would’ve sexually assaulted him, at least I don’t think she’s said or done anything to give that impression. Could be wrong
Click to expand...

This is what annoyed me about the interview. Piers was hellbent on asking if she'd sent 41,000 emails and she was adamant she hadn't sent 41,000 emails. Which could be true, she didn't. OK, but did you send 10,000? 20,000 emails? That's still stalker behaviour.
It was all a bit pointless imo, the same couple of questions repeated over and over, did you send that many emails and how many times did you meet him. She was never going to admit it was she??
 
blackcatsarethebest said:
I must admit I have about 4 email addresses, so I could get free prime on each one, I know I deserve a slap for been bad 😂😂 I’m not on fb is she still posting tit? Is Jessica is a very nice looking women, it must of took some make down to make her look like ‘Martha’
Click to expand...

Swear a few years back the advice everywhere was to have multiple email addresses, one for social media stuff, one for anything work/professional/utilities etc related, one for daily shopping use and a couple for if you were signing up to something you thought might spam you so if you got drowned you could just delete and move on. (I know you can do the + trick with most emails but sometimes it’s easier just to have a separate one). Evidently now it’s a sign of a weirdo 😂
 
CabalofBolorneaise said:
Swear a few years back the advice everywhere was to have multiple email addresses, one for social media stuff, one for anything work/professional/utilities etc related, one for daily shopping use and a couple for if you were signing up to something you thought might spam you so if you got drowned you could just delete and move on. (I know you can do the + trick with most emails but sometimes it’s easier just to have a separate one). Evidently now it’s a sign of a weirdo 😂
Click to expand...
I actually think I’ve got 4 or 5 🤣 I use 3 of them
 
Which FB profile is hers, there are now so many! She said she used to have a FB account but doesn’t use it at the moment.

I found the interview rather fascinating. There was deception for sure but there are vulnerabilities which one could argue are being exploited. Piers was in control of the interview and didn’t miss a trick did he?

I wonder if Fiona will sue NF and Gadd? One can’t argue with fact. What will it bring anyway, I wonder which direction Gadd’s career will go. The exposure from NF is huge.

Nevertheless, I hope the perpetrator of the alleged rape is called to answer.
 
Lovestolurk said:
New to this thread, just watched the interview. I am worrying that I'm either really dumb or gullible or both as I thought she came across credible to me 😱.

I do believe there's an element of truth to BR but also it's a dramatisation. Richard Gadd, who by his own admission and a big part of his own version of the story, was desperate for fame. I don't think his Netflix big break can be seen as reliable testimony and would love to see this go to court.

What I'm struggling to reconcile is the lady I was watching on screen with Piers to me seemed relatively together, composed, eloquent under pressure (this is not someone used to TV interviews) with the Facebook posts and tweets littered with erratic spelling. As Piers said she's clearly bright, so why does she type in a way that doesn't mirror how she talks or her education?

Is the Facebook profile with the flowers profile pic definitely her?

Prior to her interview having watched BR and seen her X account and FB I took it as likely mostly true. But I found the interview gave me doubts whereas most of you seem to feel it only confirmed to you that's she is not well. I'm wondering why I interpret it differently? My husband says it's because I'm crazy too 🤪
Click to expand...
Well, she isnt quite as bad, but I remember watching Alice Evans on Lorraine looking very likable and composed when talking about her marriage breakdown. But on twitter she was nuts with so many spelling mistakes. Nearly everything she said in that interview was at the time already known to be false or later disproved in court. Psychos have that power, that's how they attract their victims in the first place.

It is very obvious that she was lying. just see how she backed off anytime Piers was questioning more in detail. and how often she contradicted herself.
 
41k emails is an average of around 112 per day based on a full year. It absolutely could be her. I’ve sent upwards of that figure whilst at work in an 8 hour period, so it’s definitely not a shocking number.

I want to believe her, she comes across as believable at times. However, I refuse to believe Netflix would produce a show of such scale if it was all a lie in the first instance. I dunno, either that or it is some sort of experiment and this interview is part of it.
 
I can't get over this bit, can't share a 20 second video on here as it's too large for tattle but here's the stills:
Screenshot_20240510-165223.png
Screenshot_20240510-165234.png
Screenshot_20240510-165309.png
Screenshot_20240510-165316.png
Screenshot_20240510-165331.png
Screenshot_20240510-165340.png


P: "I mean, obviously when you make such an emphatic denial of the central point of the story, your basically accusing both him but also Netflix of lying about it."

F: "I am."

P: "And that's, that's pretty defamatory."

F: "It's not defamatory if it's true."

P: "No, no, it's defamatory that they've been to you!"

F: "Oh I'm sorry, yes. I misunderstood there. Yes, exactly... Exactly."
 
Emzykins said:
41k emails is an average of around 112 per day based on a full year. It absolutely could be her. I’ve sent upwards of that figure whilst at work in an 8 hour period, so it’s definitely not a shocking number.

I want to believe her, she comes across as believable at times. However, I refuse to believe Netflix would produce a show of such scale if it was all a lie in the first instance. I dunno, either that or it is some sort of experiment and this interview is part of it.
Click to expand...
Especially as they clearly aren’t structured of proof read. Some of the messages in the show were one or two words only, it’s definitely easily achieved
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top